本文探討英語中兩個高度常見、但在理解形成中作用方式並不相同的表達：almost 與 too。
This paper examines two highly frequent English expressions, almost and too. almost / too：boundary pressure vs. disequilibrium.
本文探討英語中兩個高度常見、但在理解形成中作用方式並不相同的表達：if 與 maybe。
This paper examines two highly frequent English expressions that participate differently in understanding formation: if and maybe. if / maybe：conditional structuring vs. incomplete settlement.
本文考察英語中兩個高度常見、但在理解作用上呈現結構差異的表達：actually 與 anyway。
This paper examines two highly frequent English expressions—actually and anyway：re-alignment vs. de-binding.
本文提出一個概念性分析框架，用以說明回應如何沿著結構化的理解路徑展開，而非僅被視為節點之間的關聯或單次提取。本文的目的不在於報告實證結果，而在於提出一組可被觀察與檢驗的結構性假說。
This paper proposes a conceptual framework for analyzing how responses unfold along structured pathways of understanding, rather than being treated as associations between discrete nodes or as one-time retrieval events.
本文探討英語中三種與願望或未滿足狀態相關的表達：if only、I wish 與名詞 wish，並主張它們之間的差異不宜僅理解為語義內容或情緒強度的不同，而更涉及願望在理解中如何被形成的結構差異。
This paper examines three English expressions associated with wish and non-current states—if only, I wish, and the noun wish.
本文考察英語中兩個高度常見、但在理解作用上並不相同的詞：even 與 yet。
his paper examines two highly frequent English words that do not operate identically in the formation of understanding: even and yet. even / yet：penetration vs. obstructed pressure.
本文探討日常英語中兩個高度常見、卻較少被並置比較的詞語：just 與 still。
This paper examines two highly frequent yet relatively undercompared expressions in everyday English: just and still. just / still：private compression vs. residual persistence.
本文探討問句在語段中的一種較少被單獨處理的結構現象：部分問句序列並不遵循典型的線性語意排列方式。
This paper examines a structural phenomenon in questioning that has received relatively limited independent attention: some question sequences do not follow typical patterns of linear discourse progression.
本文探討若干表面上皆可被概括為「軟性收束」或「撤回式回應」的英語日常語句，是否仍可能在理解中呈現不同的內部張力結構。本文以 “never mind,” “whatever,” “it’s fine” 作為核心分析材料，並引入 “fine” 作為關鍵測試組。
This paper examines whether everyday English expressions that appear to perform similar pragmatic functions may nevertheless differ in the internal dynamics through which closure is formed.
本文探討表面上可被概括為相近接受語義的中文語句，是否仍可能在理解中呈現不同的內部張力結構。本文以「也不是不行」、「也還可以」與「勉強可以」三句作為核心分析材料，並引入「可以接受」作為對照組。
A Preliminary Study of Tension Patterns in Chinese Acceptance Utterances.
本文提出一個以語句場與張力流動為核心的標點分析框架，重新說明句號、省略號與破折號在語句結束位置上的作用。
The Boundary Operation Dimension — A Structural Analysis of the Period, Ellipsis, and Em Dash.
本文提出一個場態關係的「因為」分析，主張「因為」不宜僅被理解為因果關係或理由關係的標記；在語句結構中，它的作用性在於開啟一個可能性展開的場，並由說話者提出一種關於可承接性的資格承諾。
Opening, possible Expansion, and the commitment of admissibility.
透過相位、張力與時間配置等概念，我們嘗試刻畫敘事如何在結構層級上重新分布並定位動機、行動與責任，使角色進入不可逆的存在承擔狀態。
A Comparative Structural Analysis of Attack on Titan (Pre-Sea Arc) and Frieren. Examining how narrative structures generate states of existential commitment.
本研究提出一套以語境微分幾何為核心的語義理論架構，用以描述語詞在不同語境下的語義偏折、反轉與相變現象。
A Topological Framework for Semantic Attractors, Curvature, and Contextual Meaning.
本文重新處理反諷在語言理解中的定位問題。本文主張：反諷之所以長期難以被穩定界定，並非因為判準不足，而是因為理解本身涉及多重觀看位置，其結構後果並不相同。
This paper reconsiders the position of irony in language understanding.
本文提出一種結構性的幽默理論，將幽默理解為一種結構上允許共享的在場性之入口，並作為進入此類在場性的最小結構門檻。
This paper proposes a structural theory of humor, treating humor as a structurally shareable entry into presence and as the minimal structural threshold for entering it.
